OSCAR Celebration of Student Scholarship and Impact
Categories
Excellence Award Winners

Dr. Jennifer Nicoll Victor​ – 2025 Faculty Mentoring Excellence Award Recipient

About Dr. Victor

Dr. Jennifer Nicoll Victor is an Associate Professor in the Schar School Policy and Government. Dr. Victor has established the Undergraduate Research Assistants Program (URAP) with in the Schar school and employs OSCAR Research Assistants to assist in her research. Since 2016, Dr. Victor has mentored over 100 undergraduate students and aims to foster a culture of mentorship, modeling professionalization attributes to students, and provides opportunities for growth.

Categories
Excellence Award Winners

Dr. Ozlem Dilek ​- 2025 Faculty Mentoring Excellence Award Recipient

About Dr. Dilek

Dr. Ozlem Dilek is an Assistant Professor in the Chemistry and Biochemistry department. Dr. Dilek currently supports four undergraduate students in her research and employs OSCAR Research Assistants to assist in her work. She aims to actively engage with students to help meet their academic and career aspirations. She is described as being deeply committed to her students’ personal success and growth and creates a supportive culture of student scholarship. 

Categories
Excellence Award Winners

Dr. Ali Beheshti​ – 2025 Faculty Mentoring Excellence Award Recipient

About Dr. Beheshti

Dr. Ali Beheshti is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department, and is also the director of Tribology and Surface Mechanics Lab. During his time at George Mason, Dr. Behesti has mentored 15 undergraduate research students and is described as being a sought-after mentor in his department. He strives to be an advocate in their success by providing high quality mentoring with direct engagement in challenging yet rewarding engineering problems. 

Categories
Excellence Award Winners

Mary Catlin​ – 2025 Graduate Student Mentoring Excellence Award Recipient

About Mary

Mary Catlin is a doctoral student in Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University working as a research assistant for Dr. Allison Redlich in the MoDiLS Lab. While at George Mason, Mary has mentored 41 undergraduate students and takes pride in being a resource to student success and describing the mentoring process as a passion of hers. In Fall 2025, Mary will start as an Assistant Professor in a research-intensive criminal justice program and looks forward to continuing her mentoring efforts in her new role. 

Categories
Excellence Award Winners

Anna Garren – 2025 Student Excellence Award Recipient

About Anna

Anna is an undergraduate in Computational and Data Sciences. Since 2022, she has served as a research assistant in the Schar school, and researches educational policies with a specific focus on North Carolina student and school data analysis. Additionally, she is a contributing author to the book, School Resources, the Achievement Gap, and the Law: Reconsidering School Finance in US Education Policy. In Spring 2025, she is presenting her research at the National Conference on Undergraduate Research in Pittsburgh, PA.

Categories
Excellence Award Winners

Daniel Cardona – 2025 Student Excellence Award Recipient

About Daniel

Daniel is an undergraduate student studying Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. His research assesses the effectiveness of natural and nature-based features in attenuating waves, a critical hazard to coastal communities, and he has been a Flood Hazard Research Assistant since 2024. In Spring 2025, he is leading a research project in coordination with Fairfax County in which he is investigating potential benefits and trade-offs of flood mitigation strategies considering marsh migration and re-allocation. ​

Categories
Excellence Award Winners

Amira Anwar – 2025 Student Excellence Award Recipient

About Amira

Amira is an undergraduate student studying Neuroscience. Her research focuses on florescent probe and tool development for early detection of oxidate stress-induced carbonylation in cells. Her work also led her to synthesize a fluorescent probe and characterize it using different spectroscopic methods. Since 2023, Amira has been an OSCAR Research Assistant under the guidance of Dr. Dilek and in Spring 2025, she is presenting her research at the National Conference on Undergraduate Research in Pittsburgh, PA. 

Categories
College of Humanities and Social Science College of Science OSCAR

Secretory Mitophagy Exports p53: A new pro-tumor survival mechanism.

Author(s): Layla Hasanzadah

Mentor(s): Purva Gade, Center for Applied Proteomics & Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with many life-threatening illnesses, from Parkinson’s disease to malignant cancers. Cells remove damaged, aged, or stressed mitochondria through a process called mitophagy. Our team is investigating a potential pro-tumor survival mechanism cancer cells enact with the help of mitophagy initiation and subsequent export. Mitophagy initiation is sensed by the molecule PINK1, triggering the isolation and packaging of the damaged mitochondrial segment for degradation through the lysosome. Cancer cell mitophagy is triggered by elevated oxidative stress and mitochondrial DNA damage caused by hypoxia, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. In our recent study, we discovered a secretory form of mitophagy in which damaged mitochondrial segments are packaged and exported outside of the cell within PINK1+ extracellular vesicles (EV). Additionally, we found that these PINK1+ EVs export tumor suppressors (TS) phospho-P53 and Merlin along with mitochondrial segments outside the tumor cell. It has been discovered that p53 is phosphorylated by PINK1, ultimately enhancing mitophagy. We also found that Merlin, an unappreciated TS associated with neurofibromatosis, interacts with p53 through the MDM2 mediator. We hypothesize that secretory mitophagy export of TS and other mitophagy-related proteins is an adaptive mechanism of cancer cells to withstand oxidative stress and avoid apoptosis. The export of TS p53 and Merlin were analyzed in 4T1 & IOMM-Lee cells. We isolated EVs via differential ultracentrifugation followed by immunoprecipitation of purified EV samples with PINK1 and phospho-p53 to identify protein-protein interactions. Western blotting and mass spectrometry were performed to validate immunoprecipitation results and PINK1 and p53 interaction. Understanding the role of EV-mediated export of TS in secretory mitophagy can reveal novel mechanisms aiding cancer cells’ survival under oxidative stress caused by chemotherapy or other treatments, offering potential therapeutic targets for various cancers.

Audio Transcript

Mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with many life-threatening illnesses, from Parkinson’s disease to malignant cancers. Cells remove damaged, aged, or stressed mitochondria through a process called mitophagy. Mitochondria are known as the powerhouse of the cell for a reason: they help produce the majority of the energy needed to power our cells. In Parkinson’s disease, scientists have found that the process of mitophagy is impaired, leading to an accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria within cells. On the other hand, in cancer cells, mitophagy plays a more complex role and may even be enhanced. As evidenced by my research, our lab at the Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine found that the process may serve as a kind of survival mechanism used by cancer cells in the face of oxidative stress caused by chemotherapy or radiation.
Mitophagy initiation is sensed by the molecule PINK-1, triggering the isolation and packaging of the damaged mitochondrial segment for degradation through the lysosome. Our team discovered a secretory form of mitophagy in which mitochondrial segments are packaged and exported outside of the cell within extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from the interstitial fluid of breast cancer tumors. Moreover, it has been discovered that the tumor suppressor molecule p53 interacts and becomes phosphorylated by PINK-1, ultimately enhancing mitophagy and carcinogenesis. Pancreatic cancer (PC) p53 mutations are associated with tumor aggressiveness. Decreased levels of intercellular p53 leads to increased genetic instability, higher tumor growth rate, and survival. Pancreatic cancer is the 3rd most fatal cancer in the U.S. due to high rates of metastasis and late diagnoses. Understanding and targeting this imbalance may result in new forms of personalized medicine for PC patients.
In terms of materials and methods, I cultured PANC-1 and BXPC-3 cell lines and incubated them for 5 days, then applied a drug called CCCP to each flask. CCCP induces oxidative stress to mimic the conditions experienced by cancer cells undergoing treatment like chemotherapy or radiation. Afterwards, I confirmed that I had protein in my sample, and used various stages of ultracentrifugation to isolate the extracellular vesicles produced by these cells. The vesicles came in 3 sizes: 2K (the largest), 10K, and 100K (the smallest). To analyze the proteins within my samples, I used Western Blotting and mass spectrometry, and used the ExoView R200 to examine and categorize the EVs used in the experiment.

Here you can see some images of me working in the lab: doing cell culture, running Western Blots, and observing my pancreatic cancer cells.

My project produced some very interesting results. I compared the relative concentrations of p53, the tumor suppressor protein, and PINK-1, the mitophagy-associated signalling molecule, and found that there is a very high and positive correlation between the export of PINK-1 p-p53 via EVs when oxidative stress is induced, indicating that p53 is degraded and exported alongside PINK-1 in EVs.Exported p53 may aid tumor progression and constitute a novel diagnostic method of non-invasively determining the mitochondrial health and p53 status within PC. PC EVs positive for phospho-p53 represent a novel diagnostic biomarker indicative of tumor stress. Targeting EV pathways in combination with oxidative stress could be a novel method of treating PC. Our lab is currently investigating if secretory mitophagy & EV export of tumor suppressors is common among other kinds of cancer, as well.

We recently published a paper on the topic of secretory mitophagy, but again, we hope to connect secretory mitophagy to the export of other tumor suppressors in future studies.

I wanted to thank my mentors and colleagues at the Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine for their continued guidance and support, including the following people: Purva Gade, my direct mentor, Dr. Lance Liotta, Dr. Marissa Howard, Sofie Strompf, Angela Rojas, and Thomas Philipson.

I would also like to thank the GMU OSCAR URSP program and Dr. Karen Lee, as I received funding and guidance from OSCAR throughout the past semester.

Thank you very much for listening to my presentation!

Categories
College of Engineering and Computing OSCAR

Developing an Affordable Open-Source Bionic Hand

Author(s): Robert Haas

Mentor(s): Nathaila Peixoto, Electrical and Computer Engineering

Abstract

This project explores the feasibility of developing an affordable, open-source, bionic prosthetic hand to develop an alternative to be used in applications where traditional prosthetics are not an option. Developing a functional prototype based on proportions taken from a human hand provided a solid foundation for the rest of the project. The initial prototype served as a testbed, allowing me to test different methods of control. Such as input from an electromyography amplifier and accelerometer module, that when processed by an Arduino microcontroller can be used to control servos that open and close the hand. The project aims to provide a functional prototype, design schematics, and CAD models as reference material. To be used by others in the pursuit of developing and delivering non-traditional prosthetics options.

Audio Transcript

INTRO:
Welcome to a brief overview of my Undergraduate Student Research Project, Developing an Affordable Open-source Prosthetic Hand.

BACKGROUND:
The initial prototype I designed was part of a group project for my introduction to engineering class. It was controlled by a mobile app that connected to a microcontroller via Bluetooth module. This prototype had several shortcomings, most notably the single motor set up didn’t deliver enough power to close the hand properly. This issue was compounded by the hand’s lack of flexibility.

SECOND PROTOTYPE:
When developing the second prototype, I mitigated these problems with additional motors on the back of the hand and included a horizontal joint in the upper half of the palm, allowing the hand to flex.

FINGER DEVELOPMENT: 20 sec (show pictures of finger prototypes and them video of them flexing)
When designing the fingers, I developed multiple prototypes to test different tolerances for the hinge joints. I used dual pivoting joints for the fingers to increase flexibility and extended the supports on the back of each of the links to prevent them from flexing backwards.

MATERIALS
I tested multiple materials for this project including PLA+, PETG, and Resin. Resin provided the highest level of detail with resin. However, the most practical option was PETG. It’s stronger and more heat resistant then PLA+, and unlike resin it can be printed on a standard FDM printer.

CONTROL METHODS
I experimented with multiple control methods, using an off the shelf electromyography amplifier, also known as EMG, and custom-built amplifier. I was able to control the hand using the input from an accelerometer module. When the module detects a tilt the motors wind mono filament line closing the hand. When the module is tilted back the motors spin the opposite direction, unwinding the line and opening the hand. One area for improvement is with the EMG amplifier. I was unable to control the hand using input from the EMG amplifier.

CONCLUSION
There are some improvements that can be made to the project. Specifically, further testing of the EMG component as well as exploring other methods of control, to provide diverse control options to potential users. Additionally, certain components of the hand such as the cable guides and elastic retainers could be redesigned to print as one piece. This would also reduce and optimize the materials needed to construct it. I would also like to integrate a Bluetooth component to the hand, to allow the user to configure specific gesture presets through an app.

Categories
College of Humanities and Social Science College of Science OSCAR

Pharmacological Characterization of Chimeric NMDA Receptors in Xenopus

Author(s): Diborah Gutema

Mentor(s): Theodore Dumas, Department of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience

Abstract

NMDA receptors (NMDARs) play a critical role in synaptic plasticity and cognitive function by mediating both ionotropic and non-ionotropic signaling. During postnatal development, NMDA receptors undergo a subunit shift from GluN2B to GluN2A, a transition associated with synaptic maturation and the emergence of mature cognitive function. While previous research has explored the physiological and behavioral consequences of this transition, the specific mechanisms driving these changes remain unclear. In particular, the relative contributions of ionotropic and non-ionotropic signaling have not been fully defined. Ionotropic signaling involves calcium influx through the receptor channel upon ligand binding, while non-ionotropic signaling refers to intracellular signaling cascades initiated by conformational changes in the receptor that occur independently of ion flow. This study aims to dissect these signaling pathways by utilizing chimeric GluN2 subunits engineered to separate ionotropic and non-ionotropic functions. Chimeric constructs are currently being subcloned into Xenopus laevis–compatible vectors for functional expression in oocytes. This work has involved preparation of the pGEMHE-membrane-EGFP backbone through bacterial culture and plasmid isolation via alkaline lysis mini prep, followed by gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometric analysis to assess plasmid integrity and purity. Restriction digests were performed to linearize the plasmid and confirm backbone identity. In parallel, GluN2A, GluN2B, and chimeric constructs have been cultured from glycerol stocks and are currently undergoing PCR amplification with construct-specific primers. Following amplification, the inserts will be digested, purified, and ligated into the vector. Preliminary results confirm successful plasmid preparation, and insert amplification and ligation are ongoing. Once subcloning is complete, the constructs will be injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes, followed by two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) recordings to measure receptor responses to varying concentrations of glutamate and glycine, as well as pharmacological modulators of NMDA receptors. Statistical analyses using two-way ANOVA will compare current amplitudes across receptor type (GluN2A, GluN2B, ABc, BAc) and treatment condition (agonist/modulator concentration), with the goal of identifying distinct electrophysiological profiles associated with each subunit composition. This study will characterize how differences in GluN2 subunit composition and intracellular domain identity affect NMDA receptor-mediated signaling in an isolated system.

Audio Transcript

Hello all. I am Diborah Gutema and this is my video presentation for my project, Pharmacological Characterization of Chimeric NMDA Receptors in Xenopus laevis Oocytes.

NMDA receptors are ion channels located on neurons that allow calcium ions to enter the cell when activated by the neurotransmitter glutamate. This calcium signaling, known as ionotropic signaling, is critical for synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory. NMDA receptors can also engage in non-ionotropic signaling, where conformational changes in the receptor trigger internal signaling pathways without ion movement. Each receptor is composed of two GluN1 subunits and two GluN2 subunits. A developmental shift occurs where GluN2B subunits are gradually replaced by GluN2A, a transition essential for synapse maturation.
Understanding how these subunits contribute to ion flow and conformational signaling is the focus of our project.

To investigate how different regions of NMDA receptor subunits contribute to signaling, we are working with chimeric GluN2 constructs developed by Dr. Dumas’s lab. These chimeras are engineered by swapping specific intracellular domains between the GluN2A and GluN2B subunits. In doing so, we can separate the functional contributions of individual regions, such as the intracellular tail, to ion flow and to non-ionotropic signaling. By studying receptors with these controlled domain swaps, we aim to determine which portions of the subunit structure are responsible for differences in calcium permeability, activation properties, and downstream signaling. This semester, we focused on preparing the DNA constructs necessary for expressing these receptors in Xenopus laevis oocytes for future functional testing.

The overall goal of this project is to express wild-type and chimeric NMDA receptors in Xenopus laevis oocytes and compare their ionotropic signaling properties using two-electrode voltage clamp recordings. By analyzing how domain swaps between GluN2A and GluN2B affect receptor function, we aim to better understand the molecular basis of NMDA receptor signaling. This semester, we focused on preparing high-quality plasmid DNA, optimizing restriction digests, and initiating PCR amplification of the GluN2 receptor inserts to prepare for future subcloning and expression studies.

First, upon receiving the plasmid pGEMHE-membrane-mEGFP, we transferred a sample from the backstab into a 3 mL bacterial culture, which was incubated overnight at 37 degrees Celsius for 16 to 24 hours. The plasmid includes a Xenopus laevis promoter sequence, which enables later expression in oocytes. Following incubation, we isolated and purified the plasmid DNA from the bacterial culture using a alkaline lysis mini prep protocol. To ensure the integrity and purity of the plasmid, we assessed DNA quality using agarose gel electrophoresis to check for intact plasmid structure and spectrophotometry to measure the 260/280 absorbance ratio.

Next, we performed restriction digests to prepare the plasmid for future subcloning. We used the enzyme NheI to linearize the plasmid and carried out diagnostic digests to prepare for the later excision of the GFP segment originally present in the vector.

In parallel, we grew bacterial cultures containing the DNA for GluN2A, GluN2B, ABc, and BAc constructs. Using these templates, we initiated PCR amplification with construct-specific primers to selectively amplify the inserts. PCR amplification is currently ongoing. Once complete, we will purify the amplified products and verify insert size by gel electrophoresis before moving on to the next phase of subcloning.

After the inserts are fully amplified and purified, we will digest them with restriction enzymes to create compatible ends with the plasmid vector. We will then use a DNA ligase enzyme to join the inserts and vector together, creating new plasmids that carry either the wild-type or chimeric NMDA receptor sequences. Some ligation reactions will be performed in-house, while others may be sent for commercial cloning depending on efficiency. Sequence verification will follow to confirm successful ligation.

Following sequence confirmation, we will synthesize capped RNA transcripts from the recombinant plasmids using in vitro transcription. These RNA molecules will then be injected into individual Xenopus laevis oocytes, allowing the cells to produce functional NMDA receptors for electrophysiological testing.

Two to three days after RNA injection, we will perform two-electrode voltage clamp recordings, a technique that holds the membrane potential constant while measuring ionic currents. By applying glutamate and glycine, we will evaluate receptor function based on current amplitudes, activation and deactivation kinetics, and dose-response characteristics. Comparing wild-type and chimeric receptors will help us determine how specific subunit regions influence NMDA receptor ionotropic signaling.

This semester, we focused on growing bacterial cultures, isolating and purifying plasmid DNA, troubleshooting purification and digestion protocols, and beginning PCR amplification of the NMDA receptor inserts. These steps are critical for setting up RNA synthesis, oocyte injection, and functional testing. Moving forward, we aim to complete subcloning, synthesize RNA, and characterize receptor function using TEVC recordings.

I’d like to take a moment to thank those who have been instrumental in this project.

Dr. Herin who has been an invaluable mentor in electrophysiology and molecular biology.

Dr. Dumas who has provided expert guidance on receptor signaling and chimeric constructs.

Hannah Zikria-Hagemeier who was essential in training me on plasmid preparation.

Finally, I’d like to thank the rest of the PBNJ Lab for their collective support through guidance and resources, which has been key to my growth as a researcher.

Thank you all for your help and support!

Categories
College of Science OSCAR

A Non-Invasive Buffer Based Alternative to DNA Extraction from Teeth

Author(s): Fatima Durrani

Mentor(s): Joseph DiZinno, Forensics

Abstract

In forensic and anthropological contexts, DNA extraction from teeth is critical in cases where individuals must be identified from mass disaster sites, crime scenes, or ancient skeletal remains. Traditionally, the standard method adopted by the FBI and forensic laboratories is an invasive one, involving the drilling, crushing, or creating a powder of the tooth to access DNA within the dentin. This approach is impractical, since the tooth is a piece of evidence and can be important for analysis in the future. My study aims to provide a non-destructive alternative. I followed a protocol proposed by Monalisa Heng and Éadaoin Harney, using a guanidine-based buffer to extract DNA without damaging the tooth. Cleaned third molars were placed in the buffer, leeching DNA out of the cementum. This buffer proved successful, extracting DNA suitable for analysis, demonstrating that non-invasive extraction is a feasible alternative to destructive techniques. Additional research should be done in the future, including DNA sequencing to assess the quality and completeness of the genetic material. In addition, sodium or potassium acetate buffers could also be tested for comparative studies of non-invasive DNA extraction

Audio Transcript

Hello everyone, my name is Fatima Durani. I am a biology major and a forensic science minor. Or rather I have a minor in forensic science I conducted my research under the guidance of Dr. Madden in the biology department. I am a predental student as you can probably tell from my research so let’s get straight into it. My research focus is on a non-invasive buffer-based method of DNA extraction from teeth you’re probably asking Fatima why the heck are you doing research on teeth so some up when it comes to ancient remains or mass disasters where corpses are decay beyond identification, forensic scientist Take the teeth of these corpses extract DNA from these teeth and identify individuals, however All these scenarios have one thing in common can be used as evidence fortunately, the standard protocol to extracting DNA from these teeth is to destroy the truth. Now this visual I included actually is a minimally invasive method where the tooth is drilled and the DNA is extracted that way once it’s placed in the buffer however, in many cases, the entire tooth is destroyed and into a powder. And DNA extracted that way this is impractical when you’re looking as teeth as a source of evidence for future analysis So a solution to this issue is a buffer-based extraction protocol, which is what my research focuses on I used a buffer proposed by Mona, Lisa, Hank and Dr. Harney So this buffer includes guineas HCL which help DNA extract from the tooth while preserving the pH in the integrity of the DNA so as you can see here, I included a visual that shows you that the pulp in the Denton this pink flesh inside the tooth contain most of the DNA in the in invasive protocol which includes crushing the tooth aims to extract DNA from this area however, DNA is also included in the cement in the enamel, which is the outer portion of the tooth The invasive method that I will use that the invasive method that I will use using the buffer plants to extract DNA from this cement in the enamel, especially around the root right here, so the invasive protocol includes powder rising. The tooth placing get a protein is buffer and then quantify it using PCR. The noninvasive method includes emerging in a buffer created right here and then purifying the DNA quantify it using PCR and then and then both results or both DNA extractions from both methods will be analyze and analyze using gel electrophoresis This is just me. I gonna be so loud because teeth can contain diseases so I worked under a hood. This is the invasive method that I used crushing the juice to extract the DNA. This is the buffer and the that was placed in the buffer and this was me just cleaning the truth with. To remove any debris or blood so ask for the results in the conclusions the gel for the noninvasive method actually showed a successful amount of DNA these bands represent DNA at the 450 base pair Portion Well, one well one was the negative control which was just a buffer and two was the positive control which was a swab of my cheek and then the remaining well not including the ladder were the third molars that were placed in the buffer and DNA was extracted that way Invasive method actually was supposed to be a control method that had a positive result however, as you can see deep, something went wrong. There is no bands like the invasive method and there are two but they’re very faint so the likely reasoning behind this was. When I placed the powder in the button the Chex buffer I placed too much tooth powder, which let you contamination. Some future improvements to the study. Include adding DNA sequencing to check for contamination. Using degraded samples to allow my buffer to be implemented in anthropological settings and testing other buffers such as sodium and potassium acetate, which are stronger and more likely to extract more DNA from the acknowledgments. I’d like to know who is my mentor Doctor Who ordered all of materials necessary for this project and Dr. Madden for providing the lab and the resources I needed to conduct my research. As for the work protocol, buffer were inspired by Mona Lisa Hayes study on the development of non-invasive DNA extraction method. Definitely check her study and research out. It’s very interesting. She worked on dog teeth thank you guys so much for listening to my little research. Blurb have a nice day.

Categories
College of Humanities and Social Science OSCAR

Predictors of Young Adults’ Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior

Author(s): Matthew Burdick

Mentor(s): Jerome Short, Psychology

Abstract

Although cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength are the strongest predictors of lifespan examined in epidemiologic and experimental research, over 75% of adults in the United States fail to meet national physical activity (PA) guidelines and many live sedentary lifestyles. Identifying predictors of PA and sedentary behavior (SB) may inform public health interventions. This study uses questionnaire and activity monitor data to identify predictors of PA/SB for young adults. Young adults are an underexamined population within the PA/SB literature and research on this topic has yielded inconsistent findings. Participants (n = 216) were about 20 years old, predominantly female (n = 149), and owned a smart watch. The study transpired over 29 days with a pretest and two posttests. We examined 6 predictors: perceived stress, anxiety, depression, somatic pain, meaning in life, and gratitude. Sitting time was significantly negatively correlated with meaning in life, moderate PA, vigorous PA, and exercise satisfaction. Moderate PA and exercise satisfaction were unique predictors of sitting time. Perceived stress and somatic pain were negatively correlated with vigorous PA and steps per week. Sitting was negatively correlated with days of walking. Exercise satisfaction was a unique predictor of vigorous PA and daily steps. We found bidirectional relationship between perceived stress and vigorous PA that was mediated by exercise satisfaction. Our findings indicate that interventions should focus on lowering sitting time and raising exercise satisfaction to promote young adults’ adherence to CDC PA recommendations. The relationship between psychological factors and PA might be largely explained by exercise satisfaction.

Audio Transcript

 Hello everyone. So exercise. We all know fundamentally that exercise is probably good for us. It might make us lose some weight. It might help us be more energetic throughout the day. It even might make us live longer. So why is it so hard for us to exercise? So. Research shows that cardio respiratory fitness, and muscular strength are the strongest predictors of lifespan in the research.

So this beats cancer risk. This beats smoking risk. This beats type two diabetes. If you can run fast and hard and you can lift heavy, you will likely live for a long time. Despite this, over 75% of adults in the United States fail to meet the national guidelines. So why is this the case? So our question was, what are the mental and physical factors that predict exercise and sitting behavior, especially in young adults?

And the way we attacked this question was we recruited over 200 Mason students who with a mean age of 20 years old, and we required them to wear smartwatch smart watches throughout a 29 day period. And now throughout that period we analyze their sort of different psychological and physical variables through questionnaire data.

And after that study we were able to run data analysis using SPSS.

So what predictors or did we examine in this study? So we examined sort of two classes of predictors that we hypothesized to be either protective or harmful to physical activity. So protective. We have meaning in life. So the sense that someone feels that they can engage purposefully in their day-to-day lives, sort of the antithesis to nihilism.

And now you have gratitude is gratitude can be a state and a trait so people can feel grateful. All of the time. Or they can have moments where they feel gr grateful, which is more of the trait like gratitude. Um, this questionnaire measures both the state and the trait, but it basically means how grateful are you or like how much gratitude do you have for your current situation despite all the negatives.

So it’s sort of like almost an optimistic worldview. We also have several risk factors, so perceived stress. Anxiety, somatic symptoms and depression. Somatic symptoms meaning bodily pain and aches.

So what do we hypothesize?

First things first, we hypothesize that the risk factors, so remember, that’s your perceived stress, anxiety, depression, and body pain. We predicted that that would be. Um, related to less exercise and more sitting. So for example, someone who is very anxious, we expect them to exercise less and sit more. And this is in line with the research.

Um, uh, alternatively, we think that the protective factors, so those are our median life and gratitude will be related to more exercise and less sitting. Finally, we predict that all these factors to both risk and protective factors will uniquely predict exercise in sitting. So that means that out of all the variables that we assessed in our study, we would think that the, all our protective and risk factors accountant for unique variants in our outcomes.

So what we observe. Our relationship between our predictors and outcomes is primarily attributed to our factors instead of some other confounding third variable. So what do we find? So first we found some pretty interesting information about our samples activity. So again, we have about 200 Mason students over 18 years old.

With a mean age of 20 years old, and we found that GMU students surpass Americans in meeting C to C guidelines. So that means that you can see in our figure here that almost 54% of American, or sorry, 54% of GMU students meet or exceed the national guidelines of activity. So the CD. C recommends that people, especially adults, more specifically.

Participate in at least 150 minutes. So two and a half hours of moderate intensity exercise per week, or the equivalent of vigorous activity. And so we found that in our sample over almost 54% of our students met or exceeded these guidelines. Whereas nationally, only 25% of American adults meet those guidelines.

So we’re almost twice as compliant. Compared to the average American, but this can be somewhat misleading because as you can see on our bottom bar here, the sedentary bar, almost 20% of GE students in our sample had zero minutes, zero minutes of activity per week. And so that was a cause for concern.

We found that meaning in life was negatively related to sitting time. So people who perceive that they have a purposeful engagement in their life, that they can traverse the day-to-day events of their life and feel like it has purpose. Those people tended to sit less throughout this 29 day period.

We also found that people who were physically active, especially within the moderate physical activity category, um, this uniquely predicted sitting time up to 29 days after baseline. So basically this was our big longitudinal finding that people who were. Especially active at day one of our study tended to sit less up to almost a month after baseline.

Additionally, we found that perceived stress and somatic pain were negatively related to vigorous activity and daily steps. So people who reported being more stressed and having more bodily pain, typically exercised less and walked less.

So exploratory analysis revealed some interesting results. So especially before examining the relationship between stress and vigorous activity. As you can recall, before we found that stress was negatively related to physical activity, but uh, exploratory analysis revealed that stress was not a unique predictor of vigorous activity, meaning that.

There’s something else accounting for that variance. And what we found was exercise satisfaction accounted for that variance in a bi-directional, fully mediated model. So what does that mean? It means that perceived stress has no relationship, uh, has at least no unique relationship with vigorous activity.

But when you include exercise satisfaction. It has a mediaing relationship so that, so in our first model here in Model A, we found that people who were stressed reported less exercise satisfaction and exercise satisfaction. Being a strong predictor of vigorous activity would increase vigorous activity.

So basically, people who were stressed had less as facts from exercising, and so were less likely to exercise. Additionally, this was bidirectional. So if you flip it on its head, it is also true. So vigorous activity has no unique predictive relationship with perceived stress, but when you add exercise satisfaction, vigorous activity can, is, can be associated with a lot of exercise satisfaction.

And in doing so since exercise satisfaction is, is, um, associated with less perceived stress. It can vigor activity, could then could lead to less perceived stress. I should state that this is cross-sectional data, so we’re not making a causal claim, but we did find a fully mediated cross-sectional model with these variables, some things to take away with you.

So median life is negatively related to setting time. So. If you can find a way to increase your perception of life being purposeful to you, that things aren’t meaningless, that your actions matter. If you can increase that, you may be able to sit less and improve your physical health. Um, being active, especially moderately active, decreases your risk of sitting for chronically amount, chronic amounts of time.

Uh, stress may reduce exercise satisfaction, which in turn would reduce your, um, vigorous physical activity and vigorous activity may raise exercise satisfaction. And finally, satisfaction is weigh in more vigorous activity. Thank you for listening. Have a good day.